留馀堂啟:每臨大事有靜氣,當逢惡戰自壯然!&&&&&最喜欢雨天,可以抱着一杯热茶,呆呆地看窗外,什么都不想……或者听着最爱的爵士,看那些永远看不完的书……其实生活的惬意就是如此的简单!&&&&&No man and woman worth of ur tearing, and that who worth it will never let u cry!&&&&&群防群测土洋结合专群结合+不要豆腐渣

每日时讯英文阅读:Competition from China: Two McKinsey Surveys

上一篇 / 下一篇  2008-06-21 15:31:54

查看( 232 ) / 评论( 1 )

A thought-provoking report from Mckinsey, with the globalization pace of Chinese companies, the proportion of high ranking products and services are pitiful low, the competitiveness is also at a low level, the situation must have to be changed in the forthcoming days...

Competition from China: Two McKinsey Surveys

Executives around the world expect competition from Chinese companies to increase, mainly because of their low production costs, yet surprisingly few are acting to meet the threat, a McKinsey survey shows. A separate survey of executives based in China reveals widespread global ambitions and concerns about finding the talent to reach them.

May 2008

Higher wages are driving up production costs in China, leading to speculation that companies there are beginning to lose one of their biggest competitive edges. But a McKinsey survey1 of executives around the world shows that, overwhelmingly, they still see low-cost production as the primary competitive advantage of Chinese companies and expect little change on that front in the next three years.

Four out of five of the executives also say that they expect to see rising competition from Chinese companies in the next three years. Executives at companies based in China2 come to a similar conclusion: in a parallel survey, they report that they expect strong growth in revenues from outside the country and aspire to be global competitors in their industries. The primary impediment by far is a lack of managerial talent, respondents say—a finding that supports McKinsey’s experience in the field.

The greatest threat comes from China

Among executives at companies based outside China, 41 percent say that they face more competition from China than from any other emerging market (Exhibit 1). The pressure is particularly acute for companies elsewhere in Asia, where the Chinese have focused a great deal of effort. At the industry level, respondents in manufacturing and in energy and mining are most likely to report that the greatest amount of competition comes from China. Only in the high-tech and telecom industries did it rank second, trailing India, probably because of India’s strong position in information technology.

There is a clear consensus that the primary competitive advantage of Chinese companies is low-cost production, cited by 77 percent of the respondents (Exhibit 2), including 83 percent of CEOs and other C-level executives. Looking ahead three years, slightly fewer respondents expect low-cost production to be an advantage, but it remains a dominant concern. Respondents also say that support from the Chinese government and “not being subject to stringent enforcement of patent and copyright regulations” are important competitive advantages of Chinese companies; these two issues have long troubled foreigners doing business in China and apparently remain significant worries.

Competition: Weak but strengthening

Although China is seen as having a competitive advantage as far as price, a surprising number of executives around the world—41 percent of the respondents—view Chinese companies as weaker competitors than companies from other countries (Exhibit 3). Besides lower prices, companies in China have little to offer global markets, say respondents, who particularly dismiss Chinese product quality, marketing skills, and brand strength. From the Chinese perspective, the results suggest that low costs will go only so far and that moving up the value chain is more important than ever.

A perception that Chinese companies are laggards might explain why many executives report mounting a muted business response to Chinese competitors, at best. For example, only 28 percent of the executives who responded to the survey say they work for a company that has changed its approach to sourcing a great deal over the last three years, compared with 40 percent reporting a little change and 29 percent reporting none (Exhibit 4). More respondents report that their companies tweaked the organizational structure (46 percent), marketing (44 percent), and global strategies (43 percent), but in each of these areas, less than 20 percent report significant changes. This lackluster reaction to the global ambitions of China’s companies raises the question of whether business executives elsewhere are setting themselves up for some unhappy competitive surprises.

Yet the responses to the survey also suggest that executives expect their Chinese competitors to nibble away at the global revenues of their companies. Indeed, 80 percent expect competition from companies in China to increase over the next three years. And although about two-thirds say companies based in China have had no impact on the global revenues of their own companies over the past three years, almost half expect to take a hit in revenue over the next three (Exhibit 5).

The ambitions of Chinese companies

While the global competition appears to have its guard down, executives at companies based in China are preparing for a battle royal. In the survey of executives at such companies, almost three out of five respondents say their long-term goal in moving outside the domestic market is to become a global competitor. Relatively few—14 percent—say they’d be satisfied with regional success. Indeed, an overwhelming 77 percent say they expect their companies’ revenues from outside mainland China to increase over the next three years, including 29 percent who foresee a significant increase in foreign revenues. Such expectations are in line with the respondents’ recent experiences: 74 percent say that the foreign revenues of their companies increased over the past three years, with 31 percent reporting a significant increase.

By a large margin, executives at Chinese companies say the biggest obstacle to the global growth of their companies is a talent shortage. Forty-four percent cite a lack of managerial talent as a barrier to globalization—well ahead of insufficient capital (Exhibit 6). This jibes with the view of executives from other countries, only 1 percent of whom cite stronger managerial talent in Chinese companies as giving them a competitive edge.

Overall, 59 percent of the respondents from companies based in China say they are active outside the mainland. Of these, almost half say they were pushed to globalize by increased domestic competition. Other important drivers of international expansion were the personal ambitions of company leaders, the international moves of domestic competitors, and encourage-ment from the state.

Among respondents whose companies are active outside mainland China, 46 percent say that North America is an important region for them, followed by developing Asia, including South-east Asia (39 percent), and by the European Union (31 percent). Other markets, including India, are important to far fewer respondents.

 


TAG:

自由在主的个人空间 自由寨主 发布于2008-06-21 16:30:31

我来说两句

(可选)

日历

« 2009-01-08  
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

数据统计

  • 访问量: 50363
  • 日志数: 187
  • 图片数: 5
  • 建立时间: 2008-06-04
  • 更新时间: 2008-12-29

RSS订阅

Open Toolbar